There have been multiple extreme covariates, not, and we also outline their complete outcomes here (for facts, pick Desk 5 )
Outcome of general linear combined effects model forecasting hence sensed functions of the target women influenced objectification critiques having fun with Sorts of III ANOVA.
Note: Each design just included details with the high level of advantages regarding the Opportunities Ratio Shot ( Desk cuatro ). Affairs was basically analyzed on their own due to the fact each participant replied another type of subset out of questions about an alternate subset from address feminine, and hence things can’t be joint to create total indices of each construct.
Patiency
As Table 5 shows, the sex of the participant significantly influenced all four items of target women’s mental and moral patiency attribution. Target women perceived as open to casual sex were rated by male and female participants as less capable of feeling fear or pain (Fear: ? = -0.33, SE = .07; Pain: ? = -0.23, SE = .06). In addition, results show that as a target woman’s perceived intent to pursue casual sex increased, male and female participants cared less about someone taking advantage of her or manipulating her themselves (Take Advantage: ? = -0.40, SE = .10; Manipulate: ? = -0.30, SE = .07). For both male and female participants, a target woman’s attractiveness was positively related to her perceived ability to feel pain but not her ability to feel fear (Pain: ? = 0.09, SE = .03). (more…)